This is a topic which is attracting a fair amount of interest in academia
Richard Poynder posted the below comment on the BOAI Forum today:
"The recent
decision by Elsevier to start sending take down notices to sites like
Academia.edu, and to individual universities, demanding that they remove
self-archived papers from their web sites has sparked a debate about the
copyright status of different versions of a scholarly paper.
Last week,
the Scholarly Communications Officer at Duke University in the US, Kevin Smith,published a blog post challenging a widely held assumption amongst OA advocates
that when scholars transfer copyright in their papers they transfer only the
final version of the article. This is not true, Smith argued.
If correct,
this would seem to have important implications for Green OA, not least because
it would mean that publishers have greater control over self-archiving than OA
advocates assume.
However
Charles Oppenheim, a UK-based copyright specialist, believes that OA advocates
are correct in thinking that when an author signs a copyright assignment only
the rights in the final version of the paper are transferred, and so authors
retain the rights to all earlier versions of their work, certainly under UK and
EU law. As such, they are free to post earlier versions of their papers on the
Web.
No comments:
Post a Comment