a
librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law -
See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/about/#sthash.EaoEZV4H.dpuf
a
librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law -
See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/about/#sthash.EaoEZV4H.dpuf
a librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law
- See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/about/#sthash.EaoEZV4H.dpuf
a librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law
- See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/about/#sthash.EaoEZV4H.dpuf
both
a librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law
- See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/about/#sthash.EaoEZV4H.dpuf
Both a librarian and an attorney experienced in copyright and technology law, Kevin Smith, from Duke University's Scholarly Communications Office sheds light on this disputed topic in his blog-post : Setting the record straight about Elsevier - well worth reading.Excerpt: "...............the whole idea of article 'versions' is artificial. It has been developed primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not be true, depending of the article and the publisher. Another marketing advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the ability to claim that they support authors rights and reuse of articles to promote better access which still retaining the ability to slap down authors who use their articles in ways the publishers have not pre-approved. ............."
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
the
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
the
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
the
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
the
whole idea of article “versions” is artificial. It has been developed
primarily by publishers in order to make a claim that they add
substantial value to the final published version, which may or may not
be true, depending on the article and the publisher. Another marketing
advantage that publishers get from this fabricated distinction is the
ability to claim that they support author rights and reuse of articles
to promote better access, while still retaining the ability to slap down
authors who use their own articles in ways the publishers have not
pre-approved. - See more at:
http://blogs.library.duke.edu/scholcomm/2014/01/28/setting-the-record-straight-about-elsevier/#sthash.NBhaQmbp.WNuYPpkD.dpuf
No comments:
Post a Comment